The problem is that OpenAI is likely using third-party artwork (as input to their AI) that they do not have any rights to use.I fail to understand what's ambiguous about this: https://openai.com/policies/row-terms-of-use/Ownership of content. As between you and OpenAI, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, you (a) retain your ownership rights in Input and (b) own the Output. We hereby assign to you all our right, title, and interest, if any, in and to Output.
OpenAI can assign away "all our [meaning OpenAI's] right, title, and interest" to you, but they can't assign away the rights of third parties (who never agreed for their work to be used like this in the first place).
I think that's the point - most novice artists simply don't have LordBob's level of skill. But everyone has to start somewhere, right? I think it's best if there is a pathway open for anyone to contribute to the game, regardless of skill level. Suppose that you're a novice artist, and you want to contribute to the game, but your art isn't up to mainline quality standards. You can still contribute art to UMC - it's possible that some people might even be willing to pay you a commission for it (although you probably wouldn't make as much money as LordBob would).Show me someone who can create LordBob level art in UMC and who is currently active? Most people are simply creating pixel art and not portrait.the art novice branch would be lost.
If everyone just starts using AI-generated artwork for their UMC, then that pathway is gone.
Well, I don't think it is possible to enforce 100% compliance with these rules - I think the hope is that most UMC authors will simply voluntarily comply with them. But of course the Wesnoth project might take action if it sees any evidence that these rules have been violated. For example, if an add-on contains a portrait that strangely has too many fingers...AI's are advanced or will advance to the point where they probably can copy LordBob's or Kitty's style so closely that they are indistinguishable. What if somebody sneaks that in? How'd you prove that's not done by him/her?
Statistics: Posted by gnombat — Today, 3:31 pm